To enter the virtual seminar room, please use the following login credentials:
Meeting ID: 967 5130 1571
Password: 066355
Zoom URL: https://uni-frankfurt.zoom.us/j/96751301571?pwd=V2JZUU1hdlRnb3ROU1NRRXZJTkp2QT09
Abstract:
Trust between parties should drive the design of contracts: if parties did not trust each
others' reaction to unplanned events, they might agree to pay higher costs of negotiation
to complete contracts. Using a unique sample of U.S. principal-agent consulting contracts
and a negative shock to trust between parties staggered across space and over time, we find
that lower trust increases contract completeness. Not only contract complexity but also
the veriable states of the world contracts cover increase after a drop in trust. The results
hold for several text-analysis-based measures of completeness and do not arise when agents
are also principals (shareholders) or in other falsication tests. Non-compete agreements,
condentiality and indemnication clauses, and restrictions to agents' actions are more likely
to be added to contracts signed in the same locations, same industries, and same years after
a negative shock to trust.